USDA Forest ServiceSkip navigational links    

Stream Systems Technology Center

 Stream Systems Technology Center
 About Us
 Contact Us
 Newsroom
 Conferences
 Publications & Products
 Related Websites

Stream Systems
Technology Center

USDA, Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Research Station
2150 Centre Ave, Bldg. A, Suite 368
Fort Collins, CO 80526
(970) 295-5983


Rocky Mountain Research Station logo


USDA logo Forest Service logo


Flooding, Land Use, and Watershed Response
in the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington

Jim Fitzgerald and Caty Clifton


The northern Blue Mountains sustained heavy rain and rapid snowmelt in November 1995 and rapid snowmelt over frozen soil in February 1996. The result was multiple record flood events, with the February peak flows being more widespread and of higher magnitude (see figure below).



The flood assessment focused on characterizing the events, inventorying mass wasting features, mapping channel perturbations, estimating flood magnitude and frequency, and evaluating the performance of instream fish habitat structures and stream-road crossing culverts.

In addition to flooding, the storms triggered debris flows and slides that commonly occurred in the rain-snow transition zone, in saturated loam-clay-ash soil, and on steep slopes (30 to 80%). Debris flows or torrents, the dominate feature, start as earthslides and sometimes transported debris over a distance of one mile. Roading and logging were associated with 37% of the observed mass wasting features.

High flows and mass wasting combined to produce a variety of channel responses including: scouring of substrate and banks, sediment aggradation, large woody debris accumulation, and lateral channel migration. Fluvial responses differed with elevation and land use intensity.

Flood discharge of National Forest streams was estimated using the indirect, slope-area method based on post-flood field evidence. Flood frequencies were estimated using U.S. Geological Survey regional flood equations. Flood magnitude and frequency varied by watershed with some areas experiencing one or more “100-year” events (Umatilla and Walla Walla) and others experiencing less than a “25-year” event (Tucannon and Wenaha).

Management Interactions

Instream Structures - Results from field inventories indicate a high rate (73%) of instream fish habitat structure survival. Survival rate varied between individual watersheds with a high survival rate (80%) in larger streams (5th to 6th order), while lower order streams had a lower survival rate. Anchored rock weirs had the highest success rate.

Findings and Recommendations:

  • a high rate of structural survival
  • expect some structures to move or shift during high flow events
  • design structures that work with fluvial processes, not against them
  • limit use of “rigid” structures (e.g., cabled log-rock weirs)


Stream-Road Crossings - In roaded watersheds, a sample of culverts at stream-road crossings indicated that approximately 50% of the culverts failed. The failure rate varied by watershed. Culverts in the Umatilla River watershed had a 5% failure rate compared to those in the Tucannon River watershed, which experienced a 95% culvert failure rate. Results indicated that debris and coarse sediment caused the majority of culvert failures, rather than undersizing for flow.

Findings and Recommendations:

  • expect culverts to plug with debris during large floods and design them to allow for overtopping
  • design crossings to accommodate bedload carried by high flows
  • assess upslope conditions to determine landslide and debris flow potential, and unit discharge
  • use catchment basins at inlets to capture sediment and debris
  • evaluate the benefits of decommissioning damaged sites relative to repair costs, assess needs, and downstream values


Conclusion

Forest investments, such as roads, hiking trails, and instream habitat structures, were damaged as a result of mass wasting, erosion, and channel migration. In addition, land use accelerated flood damage in some areas by decreasing slope and channel stability and potentially increasing flood magnitude. The post-flood assessments will be used to improve understanding of watershed response to extreme hydrologic events and to improve management practices to reduce damage from future high flows.

Jim Fitzgerald, Hydrologist, Environmental Protection Agency, Idaho Office, Boise, ID 83706.
Caty Clifton, Forest Hydrologist, Umatilla National Forest, Pendelton, OR 97801.
A complete summary of this study, originally presented as a poster presentation at the Inland Northwest Water Resources Conference, Spokane, WA, April 28-29, 1997, is available from the authors. To request a copy, phone or fax Caty Clifton at: Phone (541) 278-3822 or FAX: (541) 278-3730.

 

            top                       next

 Disclaimers | Privacy Notice